I was asked why the masses of the population of the fantasies of global warming simply accepted so unconditionally, accepts everything, what is set before her with that argument, and it feels good, too tortured a long time. So far I had only pushed to the propaganda, but Allan Taylor has a different explanation. Climate change is the new religion, with astonishing bonds of centuries proven sadism of the Catholic Church.
That's a good question. The reason is that global warming is the new modern religion of Western democracies. The presence in the Christian churches has long been declining and global warming has filled the gap after the propaganda of the media has on their presumed catastrophic effects on the environment, is pushing the world and made Americans into a panic.
This new green eco-religion is like a wolf in sheep's clothing and just as dangerous. Unchecked, they could in the decline of Western civilization as we know it end today. Or should I say yesterday, after some governments already very ill-advised climate policy, which are derived from an unscientific green faith, have been implemented.
Every religion or belief system, a cane or propaganda to the unsuspecting public to bring to their course. The Christian churches preaching of "hell fire and brimstone" to their believers to control. The Communists promoted the idea of the "depravity of Western capitalism," and now the new green eco-religion is the "catastrophic global warming" have to freeze all the blood in his veins.
The whole thing is heated up by the media, television, radio, newspapers, I suspect mainly because they are always under pressure to fill the message with anything resembling even the remotest idea whether any confirmation was or does not exist. In such a competition-oriented Business can not separate the wheat from the chaff media and rely on the audience to do that.
mixed to lower this error in addition, the bias of the media that they can not report "politically incorrect" views. Here, the owner or manager of the corporate media a position towards certain issues, and limit the coverage to give their belief system and pumping up an advantage to it. So viewers and listeners, give heed! Nevertheless, the Western media imperfect system is better than a fully controlled by the government, God forbid! More on this subject in the sources.
Global warming and climate change are the most misunderstood subjects today. They seem to have been made deliberately confusing the media and the environmental movement. Much of the green philosophy of a cleaner world, from energy conservation and waste reduction reasonable, even admirable, and I support many of their efforts to do that, but I prefer as the final stroke, where non-scientific factors (= cheese) and witchcraft used be to support any idealistic theory that will lead us into an economic disaster and in an alleged "green utopia". Such a task is different in principle do not have in the past, when a communist or fascist fanatical groups of which the world wanted.
Climate change is not a new phenomenon. It has always accompanied (at least 4 billion years) and will be with us forever. We are lucky to live in this dynamic planet Earth. Human beings have only been here the last few thousand years! And no amount of draconian government policies on the CO2 trading or a CO2 tax, as now proposed, will bring even the slightest change in climate change or global warming, because the natural phenomena, such as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis and Hurricanes . In other Words, give the CO2 in the atmosphere is not the fault of natural events over which we have puny human beings can not control. Nature rules the world!
Can we stop global warming? Out to us in an overheated world and environmental disaster? I'm sorry, NO, in both cases, witchcraft not help.
The global warming is not a new phenomenon and, together with the global slowdown, she became part of climate change. Recent scientific observations indicate that global warming is not currently taking place (even during the last decade and during the last 100 years only by 0.7 ° C). It is not triggered by menschengemachtem CO2, or the result of the observed increase in CO2 concentration in the air, rather the opposite. has words whenever been a significant global warming in the past, it has been "outgassing" of the oceans and rocks, resulting in an increase of CO2 concentration resulted in the atmosphere, with a time delay of 500 to 800 years (1). So much for Al Gore's unscientific and panic brochure Santander documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar in 2007 and got together with the IPCC the Nobel Peace Prize. What a Verarschung of the original Nobel prize system.
Another monumental building Chung was the decision of the Supreme Court [U.S. Supreme Court] of 2 April 2007, stating that CO2 is a pollutant under the Clean Act Air. It was a close decision, but more political than scientific. Since then there has been a real boost to the uncontrolled hunt for CO2, which is responsible for ensuring that as many people believe in global warming. Nothing could be further from the truth!
The CO2 in the atmosphere, which makes up just 385 ppm in the global average, is an essential, life-giving substance to our biosphere. The fact that it slowly increases by 1 to 2 ppm per year is not something you need to worry and it is a good thing, as many say scientists (2). How can they say that? Well, the CO2 level was 100 years is estimated at 290 ppm and then everything was good. Since 1908 was an obvious increase of almost 100 ppm measured and nothing terrible has happened to the world, ie there was no resolution of the coral reefs and no rise in sea level as they could not be witnessed in the 100 years before. What is important is the fact that the change had remarkable positive effects on the biosphere and humanity.
The growth rate of crops and forests has increased considerably and now we can (almost) 6.6 billion people, instead of the 1.5 billion in 1908, lived on earth feed. Vegetable growers usually use an artificially controlled atmosphere ppm with a CO2 content of 900 in their greenhouses to the growth rate of their plants to increase by 40%. We need more CO2 in the atmosphere, no less.
Many closed rooms and lecture halls bring it level of 1000 ppm, without being noticed by people, but it is loved by plants. In any case, the CO2 in the atmosphere is a pollutant, and we eat (bread) and drink it (beer, champagne), breathe it and enjoy it.
Long live the CO2 and down with the Supreme Court
sources of reliable information about climate change:
(1) David Evans "No Smoking Hot Spots" in "The Australian", 18th July 2008. Evans is a computer scientist who has worked for 6 years for the Australian Greenhouse Office. He concludes "there is no evidence to support the idea that CO2 emissions cause a significant climate change. Not one. "To read this article just for" David Evans, climate change, Australia "google [or for translated excerpts click here]
(2) you google "Theune Institute, Germany. Scientists report "CO2, the gas some see as a threat is actually the key to life on Earth." Similarly, the scientific work, "The Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" by AB Robinson found via Google "Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine"
The major TV and radio news channels (BBC, DW, ABC , CNN and others) are just a propaganda tool for the global warming and promote renewable energies, emissions trading and other Diversion. Only very rarely and then only very reluctantly, they will send something that is contrary to this belief system (eg the British documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle ").
[...]
0 comments:
Post a Comment