Greek God Allusions In Romeo And Juliet

expertise of brokers

Although there is absolutely legitimate brokers sometimes you doubt the competence of estate agents. The brokerage industry is indeed a licensed trade, which does assume a training and testing, but it is at medium or larger companies usually employees of independent to deal basis. These have their own Gewrbeschein like "agent address or the like.
are now trained in the rule but most of these employees also are these courses about how the male customers at the best makes you to sign. The real lack of competence or there is usually some degree of superficial knowledge, which always leads back to the customers are misinformed or incorrect.

why you should if you ask an estate agent, the professional qualifications of the employee that you care to question. It is best if you are dealing with a broker who has passed the brokers test itself.

Kate Ground Jello Jpg

Detroit: Houses cost as much as a Coke

We learn from the U.S. housing crisis, all by astronomical If depreciation of the banks. But as the whole of reality and look for the people, of whom we learn very little. Which makes this article Detroit News so special:

impact of foreclosures: Houses go for $ 1 off

Detroit - For a dollar you get a large Coke at McDonald's, a used VHS tape at 7-Eleven or a house in Detroit.

The fact that a house was on the east side of town recently listed for $ 1 shows how much the housing market is in one of the poorest cities in the U.S. under pressure.

The sale price of the house may be an anomaly, but illustrates both the depth of the mortgage crisis in Detroit and the rapid decline of the houses in one of the most impoverished neighborhoods of the city.

The house, at 8111 Traverse Street, a few blocks from Detroit City Airport, was the most beautiful house of the block when it was purchased in November 2006 for $ 65,000, said neighbor Carl Upshaw. But the house was last summer, back to the bank, and it was not long until "the Geier arrived, "said Upshaw. "The wall paneling was the first thing that came off. Then they took the fence. Then she collapsed, and took everything with them. "

The company, which had been commissioned to manage the house and sell it, the Bearing Group barricaded the house with boards, only to see that the boards were stolen, to barricade to another, abandoned house nearby.

crooks ripped out the copper pipes, took the furniture and lamps and anything else of value, including the Küchenspühle.

"It makes no sense to throw the family," said Upshaw. "Once the people once away, they will lose the house in the area. "

On Tuesday the house was wide open. The doors leading into the kitchen and the basement were missing, and the windows on the front had been smashed. The grass grew up to chest height, and charred remains marked the spot was at the recently burned the garage. came

When the house in January for $ 1,100 in the market, it had no other prospects than the squatters who stayed there for maybe one night. Faced with a tax debt of $ 4000 and a high level of unpaid water bills, reduced the bank, which owned the property, the price to $ 1

The sale for $ 1 costs the bank $ 10,000

While a price of $ 1 is not unusual when property is transferred for legal reasons, it was Colpaert for Kent, the real estate agent, surprising and unsettling, it lists for $ 1 at various points.

"I've never seen a house that was listed for $ 1," Colpaert said.

"But it was hit hard, it's nurmehr a bowl."

On Tuesday, Realtor.com listed another house, a detached house and a vacant lot for every $ 1 in Detroit.

sales for a dollar, the financial Stemming from the mortgage crisis, said Anthony Viola of Realty Corp.. of America in Cleveland.

lenders that unqualified buyers during the peak of the subprime market gave loans now find themselves as owners of whole neighborhoods back empty, dilapidated houses.

"No one has much sympathy for these banks, the subprime lending," said Viola. "And in some cities like Cleveland, let the judges not on these estates sit -. They order them to demolish the houses or sell"

The bank, which had 8111 Traverse Street, was so desperate for the property to get rid of that they agreed $ 2.500 commission fee and pay another $ 1000 for the completion of the $ 1 sale, the bank also will pay $ 500 of the buyer's expense. There are also tax bill and water bill, and get rid of the house, the bank will cost about $ 10,000.

"It makes no sense to pay some neighborhoods continue to cost about costs," Colpaert said. "It may make more financial sense to give it away."

Buyer calls it an investment Colpaert

refused to name the name of the prospective buyer, because the business was not yet complete. The broker said the buyer had agreed to pay the full list price of $ 1 and plans to pay cash.

The buyer, a local woman sees the house as an investment and will not live there, Colpaert said, though it is uncertain how quickly the investment of $ 1 pays for the buyer. Replacing the installations of the house will cost ten thousand dollars, and the owner will have problems that deter looters stealing the improvements as soon as they are installed. The demolition costs $ 5,000, Colpaert said.

same time, the new owner $ 2,009 will have to pay 3900 property tax, unless they arraigns the decision.

While it is unusual is that homes are sold for a change, which most people find in their couch crack, sold some abandoned houses in Detroit for $ 100; empty land can be bought for $ 300.

"My 14-year-old son could buy a whole block in Detroit," said Ann Laciura of the Bearing Group.

The Best 5 Eating Healthy Slogans

Mikhail Gorbachev over the Caucasus and the risks of geopolitical games

The last president of the USSR is considered a friend of the West, but even he finds in the Washington Post clear word for the events in the Caucasus. He points to a possible solution to the conflict and warned against further while the U.S., geopolitical Games:

A path to peace in Kaucasus

By Mikhail Gorbachev

Moscow - The events of the last week in South Ossetia have shocked everyone and torture. There are already thousands of people died, tens of thousands of refugees were to lie and towns and villages in ruins. Nothing can justify this loss of life and this destruction. This is a warning to all.

The roots of this tragedy lie in the decision of the separatist leaders of Georgia, 1991 South abolish Ossetian autonomy. This turned out to be a time bomb for Georgia's territorial integrity. Each time successive leaders tried their will - both in South Ossetia and in Abkhazia, where the problem of autonomy is the same - to impose by force, this situation only made worse. New wounds tore open old wounds.

Nevertheless, it was still possible to find a political solution. For some time, relative calm prevailed in South Ossetia. The peacekeeping force composed of Russians, Georgians and South Ossetians fulfilled its mission, and ordinary Ossetians and Georgians, the closely together live, at least found some common ground.

During all these years, Russia recognized Georgia's territorial integrity to continue. Clearly, the only way to solve the South Ossetian problem on the basis of peaceful means. In fact, there are a civilized world in general no other way.

The Georgian leadership violated this fundamental principle.

What in the night of 7 August happened is absolutely incomprehensible. The Georgian military attacked the South Ossetian capital Tshkihinvali with multiple rocket launchers, which are designed to devastate large areas. Russia had to respond. Accuse it of aggression against "small, defenseless Georgia" is not just hypocritical but shows a lack of humanity.

carry out a military assault against innocents was a brainless decision whose tragic consequences for thousands of people of different nationalities are now obvious. The Georgian leadership could support it only under the impression of a stronger power, and encouraged to be done. The Georgian army was trained by hundreds of American trainers and their sophisticated equipment was purchased in several countries. This, coupled with the promise of NATO membership, brought the Georgian leader to believe that they would like a blitzkrieg in South Ossetia.

In other words, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili expecting unconditional support from the West and the West gave him reason to believe that. Now that the Georgian attack was beaten back, both the Georgian government and its supporters to reconsider their positions.

The hostilities should be suspended as soon as possible and urgent steps must be taken to help the victims. It is equally important to consider a resolution of the underlying problem, which is one of the most painful and challenging the Caucasus - a region that should be approached with great caution. flared

When the problems in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, I suggested that they be solved through a federation that would secure the two republics, a high degree of independence. This proposal was rejected, particularly by the Georgians. The setting was changing slowly, but after this week, it will be much more difficult to find a compromise, even on such a basis.

old lawsuits are a heavy burden. The healing is a lengthy process that requires patience and dialogue, with the abandonment of violence as a prerequisite. It took decades to end similar conflicts in Europe and elsewhere, and other longer-term issues still smolder. In addition to patience, this situation calls for more wisdom.

The small nations of the Caucasus have a history of living together. It was shown that lasting peace is possible, that tolerance and cooperation can create conditions for a normal life and normal development. Nothing is more important than that

The leaders of the region need to recognize that. Instead of playing with the military muscle, they should strengthen their efforts building a foundation for a lasting peace dedicate.

In recent years, some Western nations relative positions, particularly in the Security Council of the UN, which were far from being balanced. In consequence, it was the Security Council unable to act even at the outbreak of this conflict effectively. While she is away the Caucasus, a region that is thousands of miles from the American continent, to an area of "national interest", the U.S. made a serious mistake. Of course, peace in the Caucasus is in everyone's interest. But a simple, common sense says that Russia there through a joint Geography and centuries of history is deeply rooted. Russia has no territorial expansion, but it has legitimate interests in this region.

The long-term objective of the international community might be to create a regional system of security and cooperation, the provocation and the sheer possibility of such a conflict makes this impossible. to create such a system would be a challenge and could be achieved with the cooperation of the countries of the region itself. Nations outside the region could perhaps help - but only if they receive a fair and objective position. One lesson of recent events is that geopolitical games are dangerous anywhere, not just in the Caucasus.

Stomach Polyps Scleroderma

Cheney: "Russian aggression must not go unanswered"

Given their interest in a continuation of their puppet government in Tbilisi and Georgia joining Nato, puts the U.S. government but a very biased view of the Caucasian war of the day. This is reflected in a opinion the Vice-Presidents:

Cheney: "Do not Russian aggression remain unanswered"

Beijing (Reuters) - Vice President Dick Cheney called Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili on to him against the solidarity of the United States bring the conflict with Russia expressed and told him that "Russian aggression must not go unanswered." said the Office of the Vice-President on Monday.

"The vice president brought the solidarity of the United States with the Georgian people and their democratically elected government in the face of threats to the independence of Georgia and its territorial integrity of expression." Cheney's office said in a statement.

How To Make Carriage Diaper Cakes

U.S. move on troops in the Persian Gulf together

The Israeli news site DEBKAfile is known for its sometimes questionable connections to military and intelligence circles, but it seems very often to correct lie. After her information regarding the combat units that move the U.S. at the moment to the Persian Gulf, have appeared elsewhere already, I will not hide from you:

Three large attack formations of the Navy for this week in the Persian Gulf expected

DEBKAfile's military sources say that the arrival of three American flotilla, the number of U.S. combat units in the waters of the Middle East increased to 5 - one since the outbreak of the crisis over Iran's nuclear program has not yet seen accumulation.

The huge naval and air force consists of more than 40 aircraft carriers, warships and submarines, some of the latter are equipped with nuclear weapons. Such a concentration was last seen just before the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Our military source called 5 reasons for this muscle-flexing of the Americans.

1. The U.S., supported by France, Britain and Canada make their preparations for a partial blockade of Iran managed to prevent the import of gasoline and other refined oil products. This action would indicate that the Bush government has to give up in terms of tougher UN sanctions and now even the scepter in his hand increases.
2. Iran, which imports 40% of its refined gasoline from neighboring countries, is practicing for the blockade of retaliation by the Strait of Hormuz closes down. In this case, are available, the American Navy and Air Force to open the road again, and the Iranian attempt to break through the blockade to fight back.
3. Washington dispatched forces to support and insurance for a probable Israeli air strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.
4. A possible rapid sequence of events in which a US-led blockade, Israeli attack and Iranian retaliation in very short time a major military crisis trigger.
5. Since a massive redeployment of this type of planning and needs, can not by their appearance flare-up of the Caucasus war between Russia and Georgia are separated. While Russia has tightened its grip on the Caspian oil resources by its overwhelming military intervention against Georgia, the Americans invest their power to defend the large oil reserves of the Persian Gulf.

The military sources of DEBKAfile called the USS Theodore Roosevelt, the USS Ronald Reagan and the USS Iwo Jima as the three battle groups that are on the way to the Gulf. Already in position, the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea to the Iranian coast and the USS Peleliu, which crosses the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.

Maxine Cartoons About Sisters

Bush undermined the protection of species from - the climate, thank

Oh, and what can be done with reference to the climate for great things. For example, the protection of species and undermine the ban in Bedeuntungslosigkeit because the existing rules now do with the climate much too complicated. And anyway, they were always a nuisance. In a remarkably open way this can be read at msnbc :

Bush wants to loosen species protection laws

plan includes scientists from the decision about the situation of a species from

Washington - The Bush administration said Monday it plans to let federal authorities ends in the future decide for themselves whether harm highways, dams, mines and other construction projects endangered animals and plants could.

The proposal, which does not require the approval of Congress would be performed the required independent opinion, the government scientists over the past 35 years have reduced. Developers welcome the plan, while environmentalists deride him. Minister of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne

said late Monday the changes would be necessary to ensure that the Endangered Species Act [ESA] will not be used as a back door to regulate the gases blamed for global warming. In May, the polar bear, the first kind, because of global warming classified as threatened. It is expected that rising temperatures, the sea ice from which the survival of the bear depends on bringing to melt.

"These changes are intended to reduce the number of unnecessary consultations under the ESA so that more time and resources to protect the most vulnerable species may be paid," the Interior Ministry said in its announcement.

"The existing regulations create unnecessary conflicts and delays," Kempthorne added. "The proposed legislation will continue to protect species while focusing the consultation process and to the actions of federal agencies, for which possible consequences could be related to these actions in connection, and it seems reasonable that these self-assured. The result should be a process that is less time-consuming and more effective use of our resources. "

The federal bill would deter the emissions from projects that contribute to global warming and its effect on species and habitats to assess.

The Interior Ministry's current decision on the polar bear as an example. While polar bears are classified as due to the melting of their Meereseislebensraums as endangered, it argues that scientists "can make a direct causal link between greenhouse gas emissions and distant observations of one influences that affect a kind," at this time no.

"Therefore it is inappropriate to advise a distant authority in respect of an action that releases emissions, since it is not possible, emissions with influences to a certain species, such as polar bears, something to do, "was announced by the Ministry.

Kempthorne has instead asked the legislature to get involved in any specific act on climate change, instead of the species protection law, which dates back to 1973.

biggest overhaul since 1988

The changes represent the biggest overhaul of the Endangered Species Act since 1988; they do would be full of rules that complement what they have not reached the conservative Republicans in Congress: Stop Some environmental reports, property developers and authorities for delays and cost increases on many projects to blame.

The changes would apply to any project financed a federal agency that built or approved. Experts from the government to produce these reports on time, tens of thousands every year.

"If they would become effective, the amendments, the safety net of habitat protection, on which we rely to protect endangered fish, animal and plant species in the last 35 years and to restore to seriously weaken it." Said John Kosyack, executive director of the National Wildlife Federation's Wildlife Conservation and Global Warming initiative.

"The new rules take decision-making on the inclusion of vulnerable Species from the hands of scientists and experts in federal agencies like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services and give them instead authorities to work on projects that could be affected by a negative absorption, "added Carl Pope, director of the Sierra Club.

Under the current law must be federal with experts of the Fish and Wildlife Service or to advise the National Marine Fisheries Service to determine whether a project affects an endangered species or damage the habitat, even if damage seems unlikely. These initial reports usually results in concessions that the 1353 animals and plants in the USA are classified as endangered, protects better, and decide whether a more formal analysis is appropriate.

design: Authorities have said knowledge

The Ministry of Interior that such consultations are no longer necessary because federal agencies have acquired their own knowledge, and examine their own building projects themselves, the 30-page draft shows.

"We believe that the federal agencies will stay with those provisions on the safe side." Says the draft.

The Head of the Fish and Wildlife Service, H. Dale Hall, said the changes would help skills to focus on projects that have serious consequences for species. "We try to be more efficient, which means to make any discussions that have a difference to the kind of episode." Said Hall.

"We are not good stewards of our resources.", He added, "if we require advice in situations where the possible effects on a species either unlikely to properly classify or exclusively beneficial, or only a remote risk for the risk of a species or habitat bring. "

The draft is subject to a 30-day public discussion before Ministry of Interior completed, whereby the government will have enough time to implement it even before the presidential elections. A new administration could freeze any still pending arrangements to exploiting or withdraw, a process that could take months. Congress also could overturn the rules through a law, but that could take even longer.

The draft was drawn up by lawyers most of the Main Committee of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce and the Interior Ministry, a source at the National Marine Fisheries Service, according to. The experts of the two authorities were involved only in the last week, the official said.

conducted between 1998 and 2002 by the Fish and Wildlife Service 300 000 consultations. The National Marine Fisheries Service, which evaluates projects that relate to marine life, establish each year, about 1.300 appraisals.

The reports helped species like the bald eagle, Florida panther and Whooping Cranes to protect. A handbook of the Federal Government in 1998 describes the consultations as "some of the most valuable and powerful tools to get recorded species.

The for and against changes

In recent years, but complained of some federal agencies and private developers, that the process in delays and increased construction costs resulting.

"We always had concerns with regard to the need of adjusting and improving the administration of the process," said Joe Nelson, a lawyer for the National Endangered Species Act Reform Coalition, a community of interest to builders and the paper and farming industry.

Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, described the proposed changes illegal.

"The proposed regulation is another in a continuous stream of proposals to cut short the characteristic of our environmental laws through the back door to, "she said. "If this proposed rule was in force, they would have our ways to save the bald eagle, the grizzly bear and the gray whale undermined.

The Bush administration and Congress have attempted with mixed success to change the law.

adopted in 2003, the government similar rules that would have allowed authorities to approve new pesticides and projects to reduce fire risk without regard to question the opinion of scientists of the risk of endangered species or habitats. The pesticide regulation was later overturned in court. The Ministry of Interior and the Forest Service are at the moment because the scheme sued for forest fire prevention. would

2005 Congress passed a law that made similar changes to the ESA, but this failed in the Senate.

The initiator of this law, Richard Pobo, R-Calif., The AP said on Monday that it will harm any species and any habitat that public authorities must assess the impact of their projects themselves.

"No way they can rubber stamp everything because they will end up in court for every decision," he said.

But internal investigations by the National Marine Fisheries Service and Fish and Wildlife Service to conclude that about Half of all unilateral evaluations by the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, the measures for forest fire prevention and safe for classifying protected species either were not legally or scientifically valid.

These were among the changes approved by 2003rd

"This is the fox guarding the hen house. The interests of agencies will outweigh the interests of the species. "Said Eric Glitzenstein, the lawyer, the environmental groups in the trial of the regulations is of forest fire prevention. "What the plan, the Endangered Species Act is to make meaningless."

Electrocuted Heart Palpitations

War between Russia and Georgia of the United States staged

The war between Russia and Georgia came as a surprise to most, was for those who had beobachtetet is happening for some time, but obvious. I find it very interesting, all the time from the Russian point of view to consider. This allows the Pravda, which has already found the culprit: the United States.

The war between Russia and Georgia is the U.S. government staged

The U.S. is pushing for an immediate ceasefire in the conflict between Russia and Georgia over the unrecognized republic of South Ossetia.

believe the same Russian officials that it was the U.S. that the current conflict have staged. The chairman of the Duma Committee for Security, Vladimir Vasilyev believes that the current conflict in South Ossetia, the wars in Iraq and Kosovo are very similar.

"The things that happened in Kosovo, the things that happened in Iraq - we now follow the same path. The further the situation unfolds, the more the world will understand that Georgia would never to able to do all this without America. Officials of the South Ossetian Defense Ministry spoke of imminent aggression of Georgia, but the latter denied all while the U.S. State Department to gave no comment. In essence, they were the ones that have power that destroys everything in South Ossetia, attacks civilians and hospitals equipped. It is your responsibility. The world community will learn of it, "the official said.

Meanwhile it was announced that Georgian troops several South Ossetian settlements, with a barrage, and so occupied the homes of people just went to the ground.

"The number of victims, including women, children and old people, goes into the hundreds and even thousands.", Said a source from the South Ossetian government in the capital Tskhinvali.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters that Georgia's actions in South Ossetia its survival as a state and as a responsible member of the international community into question, reports Interfax.

"civilians, including women, children and old people die in South Ossetia. In addition, leads Georgia by ethnic cleansing in South Ossetian villages. The situation in South Ossetia continues to worsen hour by hour. Georgia uses military hardware and heavy weapons against humans. They bombard residential areas of Tskhinvali [the capital] and other settlements. They bomb the humanitarian convoys. The number of refugees continues to rise - the people are trying their lives, the lives of their children and relatives to save. A humanitarian disaster is looming. "Said Russia's foreign minister.

The Minister added that the Georgian leadership the request of the UN Security Council to respect the Olympic Truce, ignored.

"The Georgian government has found a use for the weapons that they bought in the last seven years," said Lavrov. "The fact that Georgian troops have opened in the joint peacekeeping troops fire on their Russian comrades from one and the same contingent speaks for itself, I think." Added the minister.

"It is now clear why Georgia never Russia's offer of a legally binding non-violence for the solution of the South Ossetia conflict has been received. "Lavrov said. "Not too long ago, before the military actions in South Ossetia, Georgian President Saakashvili said that such a document was not necessary, because Georgia would never use force against its population. Now it is doing this but. "Sergei Lavrov said.

Segei Lavrov believes that the international community should cease to turn a blind eye to Georgia's arms purchases.

"We have repeatedly warned that the international community, the eyes before the massive close to purchases of offensive weapons, in which the Georgian government was involved in the last two years. "Lavrov said.

Cute Optimist Sailboats

a break ...

Dear Reader,

as Freeman of stale smoke lund it so beautifully said, must be able to just switch it off again. For this reason, I treat myself to the end of the week a little break in the absolute solitude, without the internet.
I just hope that happens this time too much and I can not trust the good old summer slump.

Sansa Wireless Headphones

Climate change is the new religion

I was asked why the masses of the population of the fantasies of global warming simply accepted so unconditionally, accepts everything, what is set before her with that argument, and it feels good, too tortured a long time. So far I had only pushed to the propaganda, but Allan Taylor has a different explanation. Climate change is the new religion, with astonishing bonds of centuries proven sadism of the Catholic Church.

Why do so many people believe in catastrophic global warming?

That's a good question. The reason is that global warming is the new modern religion of Western democracies. The presence in the Christian churches has long been declining and global warming has filled the gap after the propaganda of the media has on their presumed catastrophic effects on the environment, is pushing the world and made Americans into a panic.

This new green eco-religion is like a wolf in sheep's clothing and just as dangerous. Unchecked, they could in the decline of Western civilization as we know it end today. Or should I say yesterday, after some governments already very ill-advised climate policy, which are derived from an unscientific green faith, have been implemented.

Every religion or belief system, a cane or propaganda to the unsuspecting public to bring to their course. The Christian churches preaching of "hell fire and brimstone" to their believers to control. The Communists promoted the idea of the "depravity of Western capitalism," and now the new green eco-religion is the "catastrophic global warming" have to freeze all the blood in his veins.

The whole thing is heated up by the media, television, radio, newspapers, I suspect mainly because they are always under pressure to fill the message with anything resembling even the remotest idea whether any confirmation was or does not exist. In such a competition-oriented Business can not separate the wheat from the chaff media and rely on the audience to do that.

mixed to lower this error in addition, the bias of the media that they can not report "politically incorrect" views. Here, the owner or manager of the corporate media a position towards certain issues, and limit the coverage to give their belief system and pumping up an advantage to it. So viewers and listeners, give heed! Nevertheless, the Western media imperfect system is better than a fully controlled by the government, God forbid! More on this subject in the sources.

Global warming and climate change are the most misunderstood subjects today. They seem to have been made deliberately confusing the media and the environmental movement. Much of the green philosophy of a cleaner world, from energy conservation and waste reduction reasonable, even admirable, and I support many of their efforts to do that, but I prefer as the final stroke, where non-scientific factors (= cheese) and witchcraft used be to support any idealistic theory that will lead us into an economic disaster and in an alleged "green utopia". Such a task is different in principle do not have in the past, when a communist or fascist fanatical groups of which the world wanted.

Climate change is not a new phenomenon. It has always accompanied (at least 4 billion years) and will be with us forever. We are lucky to live in this dynamic planet Earth. Human beings have only been here the last few thousand years! And no amount of draconian government policies on the CO2 trading or a CO2 tax, as now proposed, will bring even the slightest change in climate change or global warming, because the natural phenomena, such as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis and Hurricanes . In other Words, give the CO2 in the atmosphere is not the fault of natural events over which we have puny human beings can not control. Nature rules the world!

Can we stop global warming? Out to us in an overheated world and environmental disaster? I'm sorry, NO, in both cases, witchcraft not help.

The global warming is not a new phenomenon and, together with the global slowdown, she became part of climate change. Recent scientific observations indicate that global warming is not currently taking place (even during the last decade and during the last 100 years only by 0.7 ° C). It is not triggered by menschengemachtem CO2, or the result of the observed increase in CO2 concentration in the air, rather the opposite. has words whenever been a significant global warming in the past, it has been "outgassing" of the oceans and rocks, resulting in an increase of CO2 concentration resulted in the atmosphere, with a time delay of 500 to 800 years (1). So much for Al Gore's unscientific and panic brochure Santander documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar in 2007 and got together with the IPCC the Nobel Peace Prize. What a Verarschung of the original Nobel prize system.

Another monumental building Chung was the decision of the Supreme Court [U.S. Supreme Court] of 2 April 2007, stating that CO2 is a pollutant under the Clean Act Air. It was a close decision, but more political than scientific. Since then there has been a real boost to the uncontrolled hunt for CO2, which is responsible for ensuring that as many people believe in global warming. Nothing could be further from the truth!

The CO2 in the atmosphere, which makes up just 385 ppm in the global average, is an essential, life-giving substance to our biosphere. The fact that it slowly increases by 1 to 2 ppm per year is not something you need to worry and it is a good thing, as many say scientists (2). How can they say that? Well, the CO2 level was 100 years is estimated at 290 ppm and then everything was good. Since 1908 was an obvious increase of almost 100 ppm measured and nothing terrible has happened to the world, ie there was no resolution of the coral reefs and no rise in sea level as they could not be witnessed in the 100 years before. What is important is the fact that the change had remarkable positive effects on the biosphere and humanity.

The growth rate of crops and forests has increased considerably and now we can (almost) 6.6 billion people, instead of the 1.5 billion in 1908, lived on earth feed. Vegetable growers usually use an artificially controlled atmosphere ppm with a CO2 content of 900 in their greenhouses to the growth rate of their plants to increase by 40%. We need more CO2 in the atmosphere, no less.

Many closed rooms and lecture halls bring it level of 1000 ppm, without being noticed by people, but it is loved by plants. In any case, the CO2 in the atmosphere is a pollutant, and we eat (bread) and drink it (beer, champagne), breathe it and enjoy it.

Long live the CO2 and down with the Supreme Court

sources of reliable information about climate change:

(1) David Evans "No Smoking Hot Spots" in "The Australian", 18th July 2008. Evans is a computer scientist who has worked for 6 years for the Australian Greenhouse Office. He concludes "there is no evidence to support the idea that CO2 emissions cause a significant climate change. Not one. "To read this article just for" David Evans, climate change, Australia "google [or for translated excerpts click here]

(2) you google "Theune Institute, Germany. Scientists report "CO2, the gas some see as a threat is actually the key to life on Earth." Similarly, the scientific work, "The Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" by AB Robinson found via Google "Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine"

The major TV and radio news channels (BBC, DW, ABC , CNN and others) are just a propaganda tool for the global warming and promote renewable energies, emissions trading and other Diversion. Only very rarely and then only very reluctantly, they will send something that is contrary to this belief system (eg the British documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle ").

[...]

North Face Breast Cancer Awareness Denali

Well-known columnist declared war drivers war

Joe Klein, the well-known and some circles Inconvenient Time magazine columnist has now chosen a particularly powerful enemy . And that's just because he has put the warmongers clean a lobby group in the light of day.

If extremists attack

I is now recognized as anti-Semitic and intellectually unstable and a whole bunch of other things from the people over at the Commentary blog insulted. They want Time Magazine to silence me or fire. This is because I said something that is clearly true, unspoken but in polite society: There is a small group of Jewish neo-conservatives in the 90s have tried without success to get Benjamin Netanyahu to Saddam Hussein to attack and have helped to be successful here, the intellectual rationale for George Bush to do that in 2003, have delivered. Their motivation includes a confused amalgamation of what they think that Israel's supreme Interests and those of the United States. Now they lead the charge for war with Iran.

Fortunately, these people represent a very small fraction of the Jewish population in this country. Unfortunately, their views strongly influence the way up into the highest circles of the Bush government have - and they also seem to influence the campaign of John McCain have. Fortunately, the Bush administration seems to be more interested in negotiating with the Iranians than to attack them - and according to my Israeli friends, the Israelis do anything irrational. I remain proud of my Jewish heritage, a strong supporter Israel and a realist with respect related to the small chance, in common with the Iranians. But I'm not willing to grant these ideologues the anonymity under which they aspire.

early 2003, during my first weeks as a columnist for Time magazine, I wrote a handful of skeptical columns on the coming war in Iraq, including this about Israel's security as a hidden issue. Then, with the troops in position and just before the outbreak of the war, I said something stupid on Tim Russert show on cable TV - I reluctantly said ok, we should continue with the attack. That was the only statement that I made in favor of the war and I came quickly to his senses - but that's no excuse. We have lost more than 4,000 Americans, tens of thousands coming home wounded, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were killed and wounded, and we are as a result of the war, less obvious and morally.

I will make the same mistake a second time. I do not think a war with Iran is coming, thank God, but this time I will not move his head. My voice is not particularly important in the great game of things, but I will do my job - and let the hießt, you know exactly where I stand and what I believe.

I think that there is a small group of Jewish neoconservatives there who want a war with Iran because they believe that the long term is in America's interest, and because they believe that Israel's existence is in danger. You are wrong and recent history shows us that they are dangerous. And besides, they are also bullies and I will not be intimidated by them.

Urologist For Genital Warts

loan banks under pressure to record amounts from the Fed

have sometimes even quite useful portals such as Yahoo News, as in this case . The American banks are still suffering from under financial constraints, as shown by some figures from the Fed. Inaccurate translations I apologize, the Americans have things that are so in the form we are not at there, and we therefore have no name.

borrow under pressure banks to record amounts from Fed

New York (Reuters) - loan banks in the last weeks record amounts from the Fed, as now a year-long credit crisis, continued its toll, while the commercial paper market [market for short-term bonds] continues to shrink, signaling hard times for borrowers of short-term loans.

The Primary Credit [main refinancing operation] of banks reached last week an average of 17.45 billion dollars per day, which they 16.38 billion for the week was the second consecutive week earlier record. The Fed data showed on Thursday.

"This shows that there is a lack of liquidity in the system," said Christopher Low, chief economist at FTN Financial in New York.

The Secondary Credit [marginal lending business], which is usually taken by banks claim that need money quickly rose from 34 million to 89 million dollars in the last week. Although these numbers are still very small compared to the main refinancing operation, "says the one that there is an increasing number of banks that the Fed referred to as unsound or capitalized too low," said Low.

analysts will be watching the marginal lending business just as the efforts of regional and smaller banks in the U.S., the further decline in house prices and the rise of foreclosures and bad loans of the difficulties of the banking sector for many months, or worse even years continue to be.

Some analysts write the general increase in demand for short-term "window discounts" to refinance the Fed a mixture of factors.

"I'm sure there are troubled banks in difficulties, the attempts to pump the window system," said Michael Feroli, economist at JPMorgan in New York. But He added: "More and more banks are trying to take advantage of the pure economic advantage of being able to borrow at low interest rates to move, and you see a slow fading away of the stigma, the use of discount window."

The interest rate the Fed for the discount window is 2.25%.

the same time, the market for short-term loans, a vital source of short-term funding for daily operations of many companies, last week declined from 1.744 trillion to $ 1.728 trillion dollars - that is a loss of $ 16 billion.

"The panic of last year is over. It is now ordered, But is the financial pressure and it will be more trouble, "said John Canavan, market analyst at research company Stone & McCarthy in Princeton, New Jersey.

Part of the general decline can be "asset-backed commercial paper [plant covered bonds], a sub-region, the slip off the mortgage and real estate prices has been undermined, are attributed.

[...]