Orlando Glory Holes 2010

So a nuclear strike against Iran is acceptable made

well known, makes Israel the most pressure on the U.S. to act against Iran. What a perverse level has reached and how the U.S. media be used, also a Nuclear strike to pass off as acceptable, says Professor James Petras :

The New York Times nuclear annihilation makes acceptable

On 18 July 2008, the New York Time an article by Israeli-Jewish historian Professor Benny Morris, an Israeli attack on Iran with the great likelihood of a nuclear genocide on 70 million Iranians - 12 times as many as the Jewish victims of the Nazis in the Holocaust - defended:

"Iran's leaders would do well to rethink their game and their nuclear program suspend. If they refuse to, so the best they can hope to, that a conventional air attack by Israel destroyed their nuclear facilities. Certainly it means thousands of Iranian victims and international humiliation. But the alternative is an Iran turned into a nuclear desert. "

Morris is a frequent speaker and is a consultant for the Israeli political and military establishment and has unique access to the strategists of the Israeli military. Morris defense and public support for the brutal expulsion of the Palestinians is commonly known. Still do not have it because his genocidal views prevented to get several academic awards. His writings and views are printed in Israel's leading newspapers and magazines. Morris views are not the empty rhetoric of an insignificant psychopaths, as seen from the recent publication of his open letter in The New York Times.

says What the publication of an article in The New York Times, calling for the nuclear incineration of 70 million Iranians and the contamination of a large part of the one billion people of the Middle East, Asia and Europe, about American politics and culture? It is the NYT, which informs the 'educated classes' in the U.S., with its Sunday supplements, the literature section and the editorial serves as a "moral conscience" of key parts of culture, business and political elite.

The New York Times provides a certain respectability to mass murder, which Morris had views not otherwise possessed, she had appeared in neo-conservative weekly or monthly magazines. The fact that the NYT the prospect of an Israeli mass extermination of millions of Iranians part of the political debate in the Middle East look shows how much influence the Zionist fascism 'higher' cultural and journalistic circles in the United States. It is the truth that this is the logical outgrowth of the public affirmation of economic blockade of 1.4 million Palestinians in Gaza with the aim to starve them and the concealment of the influence of the Israeli-Zionist AIPAC at the start of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, were killed in result of which more than one million Iraqis, by the Times .

The Times sets the tone for the whole cultural scene in New York, which privileges the interests of Israel as far as that not only the regular violations of international law but also the threats, specifically the promise of large parts of the world in the race to burn for regional hegemony, seamlessly integrated into the discourse of American foreign policy. The willingness of the NYT, a to publish Israeli defender of genocide, shows us how strong the links between a, as they say, "liberal" pro-Israel publication and the totalitarianism of the Israeli right are: It is like saying that the liberal, pro- Israeli establishment, the non-Jewish Nazis are beyond any limit, but the views and policies of the Zionist fascists need close review and may also apply.

Morris article in the New York Times broke no objections from the 52 presidents of major American Jewish organizations (PMAJO) because its daily news bulletin, Daily Alert, published regular articles by Israeli and American Zionists who advocated an Israeli or American nuclear strike against Iran. In other words, Morris totalitarian views are part of the cultural matrix that is embedded deep in the Zionist organizational networks and their extensions into the broad cultural and political circles in the U.S.. What the Times has reached with the pressure of Morris Madness is the discourse on the genocide of the limited environment of the Zionists out to have moved into the mainstream of millions of American readers.

Apart from a handful of writers (not Jewish, and Jewish), to publish insignificant sites, there was no political or moral condemnation of this insult to our humanity from the entire literary, political and journalistic world. No attempt was made to Morris totalitarian, genocidal policies with Israel's public threats and preparations for a nuclear War. There is no anti-nuclear movement, led by our most influential intellectuals, to reject the state (Israel) and the intellectuals of his public, prepare a nuclear war, with the potential to ten times the Jewish victims of the Nazis were slain, destroy.

The nuclear incineration of Iran is the Israeli counterpart of Hitler's gas chambers and crematoria. Eradication is the last stage of Zionism: accept the doctrine of rule or ruin the air and the country in the world. This is the direct message of Benny Morris (and his official Israeli sponsors), the place, like Hitler, ultimatums to the Iranians, "to surrender or you will be destroyed" and the U.S. threaten to "help us to bomb Iran or see a global environmental and economic disaster against.

Morris This is without question, completely, totally insane and medically. The New York Times shows with the release his genocidal hatred, such as power and wealth to the expiration of the Jewish intellectual and cultural life in the U.S. have helped. To understand the dimensions of this decline, we need only the brilliant, tragic-comic, German-Jewish writer Walter Benjamin, who fled in despair before the progressive and totalitarian Nazi terror, with Benny Morris criminal defense of Zionist nuclear terror in the New York Times to compare.

The question of the power of Zionism in America is not only a question of a "lobby", the decisions of Congress and the White House on development aid to Israel affected. Today is about the related Questions on the defense of a nuclear war in which 70 million Iranians look forward to its destruction and the complicity of the American media, as a platform, no create a certain political respectability for mass murder and global contamination.

Temporary Employment Template

speculators to claw the food supply

The ever-popular locusts hit in the U.S. again. As the George Washington Blog know it is this time not to single, large company. No, it's about the most basic human need: food.

speculators try to buy control of the food supply

According to the New York Times, Financial Times and other now, hedge funds and other investors farms, farmland, fertilizer, threshing, loading and other things needed for the production of food.

In view of the decline of real estate and financial sector and the weakness of the U.S. economy are big investors came to the former, that everyone has to eat and so that food production is a sure thing. This means that speculators will drive up food prices further up.

Jim Hightower puts it:

have "with" my infrastructure, "they take control of the food in the hands of financial manipulation to centralize, which want to reap only one thing: fat profits.

The price? Aha! That is all that's what the consolidation of farms and storage goes. If you can limit the production and inventories store - then you can drive up prices. When corn prices are lower than investors want them, then you simply store the corn, forcing up prices. Or if the corn prices are low in the U.S., then shipped to him just in Japan or somewhere else, where prices are higher. And if these disturbances trigger a collapse of the food industry? Hey, the speculators will already have billions of profits drawn from it and just to see after the next hot investment.

Hedge funds bring nothing but greed and grief to the agriculture and our food supply, and it should be forbidden "to have infrastructure."

Hightower may be right: we should ask the Congress to deter speculators to buy up a basic needs.

also strengthens my conviction that we should have guaranteed access to affordable and healthy food.

How Do I Find Out What Kind Of Pool Table I Have

negotiations with Iran only a pretext?

caused a great stir there last week that the U.S. has for the first time sent a senior diplomat to talks with Iran. Yaakov Katz now reports in the Jerusalem Post that we were celebrating too early, and perhaps still is anything but a turnaround is. More like a smart move.

government officials: U.S. talk to Iran of an attack to legitimize

The last talks, the U.S. has done with Iran, aim at a justification for a possible attack on to create Iranian nuclear facilities, the Ministry of Defence officials speculated on Sunday, as defense minister Ehud Barack to Washington for talks with senior government members departed.

Blackburn will travel to Washington and New York and hold talks with his counterpart Robert Gates, Vice-President Dick Cheney, Chief of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley.

said government officials, it was likely that President Bush attend the meeting between Barack and Hadley would. On Wednesday, Barack will be flying at a brief meeting with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon to New York.

Barack's departure took place just after the Chief of General Staff of the IDF [Israeli Defense Forces Israeli military =] Lt.-Gen Gabi Ashkenazi on Sunday from a week-long Visiting the U.S. had returned as a guest Mullens. Ashkenazi held talks with Cheney, Hadley and other senior officials, which focused on the Iranian nuclear program.

"Right now run many strategic considerations from what Iran is concerned, but no one has decided what to do," said a high IDF officer who was involved in the talks between Israel and the U.S.. "We are still far from the time to bow to the military itself together over cards and plan an operation."

In recent weeks, Mullen had said publicly that he opposed military action against Iran, which has a third front for that could open just in Iraq and Afghanistan fighting U.S. is.

Barack talks in the U.S. find a good week after the U.S. sent its third highest diplomat to the EU negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program in Geneva instead.

"This way, they will say, they have tried everything," one official speculated. "This will increase America's chances of public support both at home and the support of the European countries that are now against military action to get."

diplomats had also speculated that the talks between Iran and the U.S. faced with the presidential elections here.

The IDF officer, according to the regular meetings between Israel and the U.S. in recent weeks - Mullen was in Israel in June - a sign of the strong links between the two countries and for the common interest, both in various regional issues such as Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas and Syria.